The Preferred Outcome Principle for defective building work

sydney lawyer defective building work

The Preferred Outcome Principle

Section 49MA Home Building Act 1989

Section 48MA of the Home Building Act 1989 says that rectification of defective residential work by the original builder is the ‘preferred outcome’ of the proceedings.

In Clements v Murphy [2018] NSWCATAP 152 NCAT’s Appeal Panel considered whether this principle extended to incomplete work as well as defective work, and after the contract had been terminated.

At first instance Senior Member Goldstein determined that s48MA related only to defective work. He considered that there was no good reason not to implement the preferred outcome principle and ordered the builder to rectify 15 items of work. The Builder was also ordered to pay the owners $45,054.79 for incomplete work.

The Builder appealed. The Appeal Panel determined that s48MA is ‘not intended to apply to work which is incomplete and cannot be characterised as defective work.’

Practically speaking, the line between incomplete work and defective work can be very fine, leading to complications in this area.

Need legal advice?

Clare Peacock, Principal solicitor at Northern Beaches Construction Lawyers, provides practical advice on the many issues that can and do arise from residential living, building works, construction contracts, and strata living. These regulations are a complex web of statutes, by-laws, regulations, case law and know-how, and involving a number of parties and their obligations.  It is important, when these issues arise, to involve a lawyer who is familiar with the specific area of law. This is where Clare can help.

Clare Peacock
Principal Solicitor
Northern Beaches Construction Lawyers

REQUEST A CALL BACK »